Review



yap1  (Cell Signaling Technology Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Cell Signaling Technology Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 98

    Structured Review

    Cell Signaling Technology Inc yap1
    Yap1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1321 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/yap1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 98 stars, based on 1321 article reviews
    yap1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    98/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    95
    Novus Biologicals rabbit anti yap1
    Rabbit Anti Yap1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti yap1/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti yap1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc yap1
    Yap1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/yap1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    yap1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech rabbit anti yap
    Rabbit Anti Yap, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rabbit anti yap/product/Proteintech
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rabbit anti yap - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc yap1 rabbit monoclonal antibody
    Yap1 Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/yap1 rabbit monoclonal antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    yap1 rabbit monoclonal antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc p yap1
    TROP2 suppression sensitized NSCLC to RSL3-induced ferroptosis in vivo. ( A ) Schematic diagram of the in vivo experimental timeline. Nude mice were subcutaneously injected with control (shCON) or TROP2-knockdown (shTROP2) PC9 cells, followed by intraperitoneal injection of RSL3 (5 mg/kg) or vehicle every other day. ( B ) Representative photographs of dissected subcutaneous tumors from each treatment group at the endpoint of the study. ( C ) Final tumor weights from each group at the endpoint. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). ( D ) Tumor growth curves showing tumor volume over time for the four experimental groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM ( n = 6 mice per group). ( E ) Representative IHC images of tumor sections stained for TROP2, <t>YAP1,</t> HMOX1, ACSL4, and SLC7A11 from the indicated groups. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6, C) or mean ± SEM ( n = 6 mice per group, D ). Statistical significance for differences among groups was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (C, and for the final time point in D). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01
    P Yap1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/p yap1/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    p yap1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    98
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti yap1 antibody
    TROP2 suppression sensitized NSCLC to RSL3-induced ferroptosis in vivo. ( A ) Schematic diagram of the in vivo experimental timeline. Nude mice were subcutaneously injected with control (shCON) or TROP2-knockdown (shTROP2) PC9 cells, followed by intraperitoneal injection of RSL3 (5 mg/kg) or vehicle every other day. ( B ) Representative photographs of dissected subcutaneous tumors from each treatment group at the endpoint of the study. ( C ) Final tumor weights from each group at the endpoint. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). ( D ) Tumor growth curves showing tumor volume over time for the four experimental groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM ( n = 6 mice per group). ( E ) Representative IHC images of tumor sections stained for TROP2, <t>YAP1,</t> HMOX1, ACSL4, and SLC7A11 from the indicated groups. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6, C) or mean ± SEM ( n = 6 mice per group, D ). Statistical significance for differences among groups was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (C, and for the final time point in D). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01
    Anti Yap1 Antibody, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 98/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti yap1 antibody/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 98 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti yap1 antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    98/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    TROP2 suppression sensitized NSCLC to RSL3-induced ferroptosis in vivo. ( A ) Schematic diagram of the in vivo experimental timeline. Nude mice were subcutaneously injected with control (shCON) or TROP2-knockdown (shTROP2) PC9 cells, followed by intraperitoneal injection of RSL3 (5 mg/kg) or vehicle every other day. ( B ) Representative photographs of dissected subcutaneous tumors from each treatment group at the endpoint of the study. ( C ) Final tumor weights from each group at the endpoint. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). ( D ) Tumor growth curves showing tumor volume over time for the four experimental groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM ( n = 6 mice per group). ( E ) Representative IHC images of tumor sections stained for TROP2, YAP1, HMOX1, ACSL4, and SLC7A11 from the indicated groups. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6, C) or mean ± SEM ( n = 6 mice per group, D ). Statistical significance for differences among groups was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (C, and for the final time point in D). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01

    Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

    Article Title: TROP2 confers resistance to oxidative stress-induced cancer cell death through YAP/HMOX1 signaling

    doi: 10.1186/s12967-026-07955-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: TROP2 suppression sensitized NSCLC to RSL3-induced ferroptosis in vivo. ( A ) Schematic diagram of the in vivo experimental timeline. Nude mice were subcutaneously injected with control (shCON) or TROP2-knockdown (shTROP2) PC9 cells, followed by intraperitoneal injection of RSL3 (5 mg/kg) or vehicle every other day. ( B ) Representative photographs of dissected subcutaneous tumors from each treatment group at the endpoint of the study. ( C ) Final tumor weights from each group at the endpoint. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6). ( D ) Tumor growth curves showing tumor volume over time for the four experimental groups. Data are presented as mean ± SEM ( n = 6 mice per group). ( E ) Representative IHC images of tumor sections stained for TROP2, YAP1, HMOX1, ACSL4, and SLC7A11 from the indicated groups. Scale bar, 100 μm. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 6, C) or mean ± SEM ( n = 6 mice per group, D ). Statistical significance for differences among groups was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (C, and for the final time point in D). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01

    Article Snippet: After that, the membranes were blocked in 5% fat-free milk for 1 h. The membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies including TROP2 (1:1000, cat #47866, CST), GPX4 (1:1000, cat #AF7020, Beyotime), SLC7A11 (1:1000, cat #AF7992, Beyotime), ACSL4 (1:1000, cat #AG1908, Beyotime), HMOX1 (1:1000, cat #AG2181, Beyotime), YAP1 (1:1000, cat #14074, CST), P-YAP1 (1:1000, cat #13619, CST), LATS1 (1:1000, cat #3477, CST), p-LATS1 (1:1000, cat #9157, CST), Histone3 (1:1000, cat #9715, CST),α-Tubulin (1:1000, cat #2144, CST) at 4 °C overnight and the secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. Protein bands were visualized using the ECL (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

    Techniques: In Vivo, Injection, Control, Knockdown, Staining

    TROP2 confers ferroptosis resistance by inactivating YAP to suppress HMOX1 transcription. ( A ) YAP1 mRNA levels in H292 and PC9 cells with TROP2 knockdown, as determined by qRT-PCR. ( B ) YAP1 mRNA levels in PC9 and A549 cells with TROP2 overexpression, as determined by qRT-PCR. ( C ) Representative IF images showing enhanced nuclear localization of YAP (green) in PC9 cells upon TROP2 knockdown. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 50 μm. ( D ) Representative IF images showing suppressed nuclear localization of YAP (green) in PC9 cells upon TROP2 overexpression. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( E ) Western blot analysis of YAP protein levels in nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of PC9 and H292 cells with or without TROP2 knockdown. ( F ) Quantitative analysis (bar graph) of the bands was shown adjacent to the representative blots (from E). ( G, H ) Cell viability assessed by CCK-8 assay in PC9 and H292 cells with TROP2 knockdown, with or without concomitant YAP inhibition, following RSL3 treatment. ( I,J ) Measurement of cellular GSH levels in PC9 and H292 cells under the indicated conditions. ( K, L ) Measurement of cellular MDA levels in PC9 and H292 cells under the indicated conditions. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( A , B , F ); two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s post hoc test or three-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s post hoc test ( G - L ). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01

    Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

    Article Title: TROP2 confers resistance to oxidative stress-induced cancer cell death through YAP/HMOX1 signaling

    doi: 10.1186/s12967-026-07955-z

    Figure Lengend Snippet: TROP2 confers ferroptosis resistance by inactivating YAP to suppress HMOX1 transcription. ( A ) YAP1 mRNA levels in H292 and PC9 cells with TROP2 knockdown, as determined by qRT-PCR. ( B ) YAP1 mRNA levels in PC9 and A549 cells with TROP2 overexpression, as determined by qRT-PCR. ( C ) Representative IF images showing enhanced nuclear localization of YAP (green) in PC9 cells upon TROP2 knockdown. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 50 μm. ( D ) Representative IF images showing suppressed nuclear localization of YAP (green) in PC9 cells upon TROP2 overexpression. Scale bar, 50 μm. ( E ) Western blot analysis of YAP protein levels in nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions of PC9 and H292 cells with or without TROP2 knockdown. ( F ) Quantitative analysis (bar graph) of the bands was shown adjacent to the representative blots (from E). ( G, H ) Cell viability assessed by CCK-8 assay in PC9 and H292 cells with TROP2 knockdown, with or without concomitant YAP inhibition, following RSL3 treatment. ( I,J ) Measurement of cellular GSH levels in PC9 and H292 cells under the indicated conditions. ( K, L ) Measurement of cellular MDA levels in PC9 and H292 cells under the indicated conditions. Data are presented as mean ± SD ( n = 3). Statistical significance was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test ( A , B , F ); two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s post hoc test or three-way ANOVA followed by Sidak’s post hoc test ( G - L ). ∗ P < 0.05, ∗∗ P < 0.01

    Article Snippet: After that, the membranes were blocked in 5% fat-free milk for 1 h. The membranes were incubated with the primary antibodies including TROP2 (1:1000, cat #47866, CST), GPX4 (1:1000, cat #AF7020, Beyotime), SLC7A11 (1:1000, cat #AF7992, Beyotime), ACSL4 (1:1000, cat #AG1908, Beyotime), HMOX1 (1:1000, cat #AG2181, Beyotime), YAP1 (1:1000, cat #14074, CST), P-YAP1 (1:1000, cat #13619, CST), LATS1 (1:1000, cat #3477, CST), p-LATS1 (1:1000, cat #9157, CST), Histone3 (1:1000, cat #9715, CST),α-Tubulin (1:1000, cat #2144, CST) at 4 °C overnight and the secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. Protein bands were visualized using the ECL (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

    Techniques: Knockdown, Quantitative RT-PCR, Over Expression, Staining, Western Blot, CCK-8 Assay, Inhibition, Two Tailed Test